A controlled study comparing visual function in patients treated with vigabatrin and tiagabine.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE Vigabatrin treatment is frequently associated with irreversible retinal injury and produces retinal electrophysiological changes in nearly all patients. Concern has been raised that tiagabine and other antiepilepsy drugs (AEDs) that increase brain gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) might produce similar electrophysiological and clinical changes in visual function. The study compared visual function between groups of patients with epilepsy treated long term with tiagabine, vigabatrin, and patients treated with other AEDs. METHODS A cross sectional study comparing visual acuity, colour vision, static and kinetic perimetry, and electroretinograms between groups of patients treated with tiagabine, vigabatrin, and other AEDs (control patients). Patients were adults receiving stable AED treatment for >6 months. RESULTS Vigabatrin treated patients had marked visual field constrictions in kinetic perimetry (mean radius 39.6 degrees OD, 40.5 degrees OS), while tiagabine patients had normal findings (mean 61 degrees OD, 62 degrees OS) (differences OD and OS, p=0.001), which were similar to epilepsy control patients (mean 60 degrees OD, 61 degrees OS). Vigabatrin patients had abnormal electroretinographic photopic B wave, oscillatory, and flicker responses, which correlated with visual field constrictions. These electroretinographic responses were normal for tiagabine patients and control patients. Patients were treated with vigabatrin for a median of 46 months compared with 29 months for tiagabine. Patients taking other AEDs that may change brain GABA had normal visual function. CONCLUSION Unlike vigabatrin, tiagabine treatment is associated with normal electroretinography and visual fields and ophthalmological function similar to epilepsy control patients. Differences between vigabatrin and other GABA modulating AEDs in retinal drug concentrations and other effects might explain why tiagabine increases in GABA reuptake do not cause retinal injury.
منابع مشابه
Visual fields and tiagabine: a quandary
This case report describes the development of asymptomatic visual field defects (VFDs) in a psychiatric patient with bipolar disorder receiving adjunctive tiagabine treatment. These defects were apparently reversible upon the discontinuation of tiagabine. Controlled clinical trials are indicated to determine if this finding is indicative of a class effect for all GABAergic antiepileptic drugs (...
متن کاملRefractory epilepsy: treatment with new antiepileptic drugs
Five antiepileptic drugs have been marketed in the last decade. We report here a retrospective study of patients attending our unit who were prescribed one of the new antiepileptic drugs. All these patients had refractory localization related epilepsy and had failed to respond to a first-line drug. The drugs had a different profile of side-effects but topiramate (42%) was the most common drug t...
متن کاملThe effect of antiepileptic drugs on visual performance
Visual disturbances are a common side-effect of many antiepileptic drugs. Non-specific retino- and neurotoxic visual abnormalities, that are often reported with over-dosage and prolonged AED use, include diplopia, blurred vision and nystagmus. Some anticonvulsants are associated with specific visual problems that may be related to the mechanistic properties of the drug, and occur even when the ...
متن کاملTiagabine-induced absence status in idiopathic generalized epilepsy
Several medications such as baclofen, amitriptyline and even antiepileptic drugs such as carbamazepine or vigabatrin are known to induce absence status epilepticus in patients with generalized epilepsies. Tiagabine (TGB) is effective in patients with focal epilepsies. However, TGB has also been reported to induce non-convulsive status epilepticus in several patients with focal epilepsies and in...
متن کاملVigabatrin and tiagabine are pharmacologically different drugs. A pre-clinical study
In light of theirclosely related mechanisms of action, and preliminary clinical evidence suggesting that they possess similar efficacies, it has been anecdotally suggested that vigabatrin and tiagabine may prove to be therapeutically indistinguishable. As a result, we have conducted a preclinical comparison of their anticonvulsant profile and mechanism of action. Pentylenetetrazol and maximal e...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry
دوره 74 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003